Van Irion: Judge wants definition of “Natural born citizen”

Van continues his fight! Obama is not a natural born citizen, he is also a fraud and is a “fake president” with no constitutional right to be in the office today! Continue to pray for my dear friend as he continues this most influential battle! I believe our future and our freedom depends upon it!

WND EXCLUSIVE
JUDGE WANTS DEFINITION OF ‘NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’

‘Resolution of this federal issue will resolve the case’

by BOB UNRUHE

A federal judge has determined in a case challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility for a state ballot that the meaning of the constitutional phrase “natural born citizen” is “important and not trivial.”

U.S. District Judge S. Thomas Anderson of Tennessee said the courts ultimately must define “natural born citizen,” affirming that the “issue of whether President Obama is constitutionally qualified to run for the presidency is certainly substantial.”

“This specific question has been raised in numerous lawsuits filed since President Obama took office,” Anderson wrote in his opinion. “The outcome of the federal question in this case will certainly have an effect on other cases presenting the same issue about whether President Obama meets the constitutional qualifications for the presidency.”

Van Irion, whose Liberty Legal Foundation brought the case, alleges the plan by Tennessee Democrats to register Obama as their nominee for president opens a case, under state law, of negligent misrepresentation and fraud or intentional misrepresentation because of doubts about Obama’s eligibility.

Irion was pleased the court recognized the significance of the claims.

“The court made several very positive statements about our case,” he noted.

He cited Anderson’s statement that the court “finds that the federal question presented, the meaning of the phrase ‘natural born citizen’ as a qualification for the presidency set out in Article II of the Constitution, is important and not trivial.”

“It is clear that the stated federal issue of President Obama’s qualifications for the office are ‘actually disputed and substantial,” the judge said.

Anderson said it also is “clear that there will be a legal dispute over the Constitution’s definition of ‘natural born citizen’ and the Supreme Court’s decision in Minor.”

Irion told supporters, “While it is certainly dangerous to read too much into such an opinion, the statements from this federal court are encouraging. The court appears to understand the most critical issues presented by our complaint.”

He told WND that the issue identified by Anderson is what virtually all of the dozens of cases challenging Obama’s eligibility have been seeking: a ruling on accusations that Obama is unqualified.

Previously, cases have been dismissed based on standing or other technicalities, not on the merits.

The decision from Anderson came in a case brought by Irion on behalf of voters and political candidates in Tennessee. The plaintiffs argue Obama’s name cannot be submitted because he is ineligible.

The defendants had moved the case from state court, where Irion wanted to argue the state issues, to federal court, where Obama virtually has batted a thousand in preventing cases from reaching the point at which the merits are assessed.

Irion had submitted a motion to have the case returned to the state courts, a request Anderson denied.

But Irion was heartened by the comments from the judge, who said that without a determination on the questions facing the court, there easily could be differing results in court jurisdictions around the nation.

“There is a risk of inconsistent adjudications on the federal issue presented,” the judge said.

Irion also had raised questions about “Obama’s dual citizenship” and allegations that his Social Security number is fraudulent.

“The court construes these allegations about President Obama … as corroboration of plaintiffs’ main allegation that President Obama is not a natural born citizen or otherwise qualified to be president,” the judge wrote.

Anderson’s opinion included a notation that the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett defined “natural born citizen” as “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”

“It is undisputed that the material fact at issue in this case is whether under the circumstances of president Obama’s birth, the president is a ‘natural born citizen,’ a term set out in the United States Constitution and construed under federal law,” he wrote.

The case is developing just as a new petition urges members of Congress to take the issue seriously by investigating it. The number of names on the document has surged past 40,000 and soon will be approaching 50,000.

WND reported just a day ago that members of Congress, regarding Obama’s eligibility, still are relying on statements from Hawaii officials, “vetting” by voters and his own word.

Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio., for example has said. “I will continue to take the president at his word that he is a natural born citizen of the United States.”

Obama released an image of a Hawaiian long-form birth certificate on April 27, 2011, after years of stating that the document was not available. But at that time, the Hawaii Department of Health and governor’s office refused to confirm for WND that the image released was an accurate representation of the state’s records.

However, Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s law enforcement investigators have found probable cause that the document is a forgery. Others, meanwhile, argue that the document affirms Obama is not eligible, because it lists his father as a foreigner. The Founders, they argue, understood “natural born citizen” to be the offspring of two American citizens.

Emergency Injunction Filed with Georgia Supreme Court over Obamas eligibility

Emergency Injunction Filed with Georgia Supreme Court over Obamas eligibility

Georgia held its Presidential Primary election Tuesday. Obama’s name was on the ballot. But they haven’t won this battle yet. Today Liberty Legal Foundation filed an appeal with the Georgia Supreme Court challenging the absurd ruling that dismissed our case from the Georgia Superior Court. (In Georgia the Superior Court is a mid-level court. The Supreme Court is the highest Court in Georgia.)

We also filed an emergency motion for preliminary injunction with the Georgia Supreme Court. Since it’s too late to have Obama’s name removed from the primary ballots, we’re asking the Supreme Court to prohibit the Secretary of State from certifying the results of the Democratic Presidential Primary election. Typically it takes about a week for the Secretary of State to certify an election. The results of an election are not official until he certifies. So, if the Supreme Court grants our motion the results of Obama’s Georgia primary election will be on hold pending the outcome of our lawsuit.

This may be our final test for an uncorrupted portion of the justice system in Georgia. As you can see by reading our filings on our website, the Georgia Supreme Court has no excuse for denying our motion. We are not asking for anything that would harm Obama in the short term in any way. We’re not asking for anything that would cost the Georgia taxpayers a dime. All we’re asking for is to have the Secretary of State wait to certify the Democratic Primary election until the Georgia Supreme Court can hear our case. If we lose our case, Obama will still get the Georgia delegates at the Democratic National Convention. But we will have been successful in getting the Court to hear the substance of our case. If we win, we will have upheld Georgia state law and the U.S. Constitution.

My point is this: because the relief we’re asking for in our motion will hurt no one, there is no reason for the Georgia Supreme Court to deny it. It SHOULD be a “no brainer.” It hurts no one to grant our motion and it hurts everyone to deny it. So, now we wait to see if the Georgia judicial corruption goes all the way to the top. Please pray with me that instead we will find an honorable Judge that will follow the law.

Van Irion

Corrupt Judicial Branch harasses Van Irion, founding fathers warned of this day

I became nauseous while reading this letter from Van Irion regarding the events of that disappointing day in Georgia regarding Obamas eligibility.

Our country is in a heap of trouble! Our founding fathers wrote the constitution to protect us from such tyrannical and maniacal attitudes toward citizen who attempt to apply the law in order to be represented and have a voice! We no longer have the power of the people. We can no longer assume that because we are American we will get a fair hearing in a high court in this country!

Our goose is cooked, stick a fork in it, we are done, fineesh!

Our dishonorable judges have lost their moral compass and have quickly become a cancer that is spreading to shield our tyrannical Kings and Queens from being accountable to the people within the confines of the Constitution!

The once sacred document, behind thick glass in a museum has been shredded and desecrated! The document exists only as a piece of tattered paper with a passing historical side bar as it’s memory!

We must stand strong with Van to continue this fight! It’s not cheap or inexpensive! He, as a representative of your conservative psyche is counter punching and is leaning back on his heels getting punch drunk from the constant barrage of blows! He is facing the battle essentially alone and is hunkering down for the assault! He is standing in the gap and giving it all he can! But to be honest with you it’s not cheap!

I dont usually do this bit I am asking you to please visit Liberty Legal Foundation website and donate any amount of money to give him and LLF the fuel to continue the fight! Only if it is 5.00 or 5, 000 dollars any amount will make a difference! He is giving his time to the fight of his life, the least we can do is send him a few dollars! Please pass this around to all your friends! Van didn’t ask me to do this but I know how important it is to have a war chest to fight this horrible corrupt regime! Thank you and as he faces these giants he will know he has our support! Please give now and freely if you are able and send around to your friends list and ask them to do the same! Our freedom is dependent on it, our Republic is worth every dime of it!

Read below and see if you will feel exactly as I do! Read this blatant disregard for our laws of this land! Contempt is not good enough. Please read and tell me how you feel in the comments section of this blog. We need to sound off on this epic failure of our government! Get busy patriots!

So much has happened recently demonstrating the lack of honor in our judicial system that I’m now forced to review these incidents in bullet point format:

The President’s attorney dishonors the Georgia Administrative Court by sending a letter directly to the Secretary of State requesting the executive branch of Georgia to take a lawsuit away from the judicial branch.
The President and his attorney dishonor the Georgia Administrative court again by violating that court’s order to appear.
The Georgia Administrative Court refuses to forward Liberty Legal Foundation’s motion for contempt to the Georgia Supreme Court, despite Georgia law leaving the Administrative court no discretion on this matter.
The Georgia Administrative court refuses to even respond to correspondence regarding our motion for contempt.
The Georgia Superior Court fails to comment on the motion for contempt or require the Administrative court to forward records, as required by law.
The Georgia Superior Court Clerk initially refuses to file LLF’s appeal document, then backs down after being instructed on the law.
The Georgia Superior Court Clerk refuses to file LLF’s emergency motion for preliminary injunction because $1 was not included with our filing. Then, when LLF hand delivers $1 to the clerk, the clerk sits on the motion for 10 days and mails it back to LLF claiming that the correct staffer didn’t get the $1. Our plaintiff gave the case number, name of the motion, and name of the staffer, who was literally pointed at in the room. Yet the clerk’s office still claims that that staffer didn’t get the $1. The motion had to be completely re-filed and was then delayed another two days before finally being filed.
The Chief Judge of the Superior Court was made aware of all of the incidents occurring in her Clerk’s office, yet she did nothing to correct the situation.
The President’s motion to dismiss was filed on his first attempt. After three days the Court notified LLF that the Court had shortened the time to file an opposition to that motion, giving us less than a day to file.
Late that same day the Chief Judge signs an order denying LLF’s motion to have Van Irion admitted as a visiting attorney in this case, preventing LLF from filing the opposition that the Court had ordered us to file 6 hours earlier. (Note that I’ve been admitted as a visiting attorney in 5 states and at every level of court, both state and federal. I’ve never been denied admission before. Further, my local attorney sponsor was a sitting member of the state’s legislature, making this denial even more shocking.) Even more outrageous is the timing of the denial, made just hours before a Court-set deadline, after the Court sat on our motion for more than two weeks.
The Georgia Secretary of State has, to date, refused to forward the record of the case to the Superior Court, despite Georgia law absolutely requiring this action and requiring that it be done as soon as possible.
The Superior Court does nothing to require the Secretary of State to forward the record of the case.
Only 90 minutes after our plaintiff files an opposition himself (because LLF was denied the ability to file it for him), the Chief Judge issues a three-page opinion granting Obama’s motion to dismiss our appeal. It seems obvious that the Court’s opinion was written before they asked us to file an opposition. Also, the dismissal was granted while the Court had not even received the record of the hearing held by the lower court. In other words, it ruled without even reviewing the record or reading our plaintiff’s opposition.
Our system of government is based upon an assumption that the people placed in high office are honorable. This is an absolute requirement for the survival of our nation. The Founding Fathers understood that when dishonorable people begin to take high office, the system of government they set into motion would begin to fail. Unfortunately America’s judicial system is proving this principle.

These are just the incidents associated with our Georgia case and we are not discussing the substance of the breathtakingly absurd rulings from any of these courts. Without needing to discuss judicial rulings, the incidents cited here demonstrate the harassment, bias, and lack of honor in the administrative operation of our courts. This bias effectively prevents those on one side of an issue to have basic access to the courts.In other words, the courts are now barring specific viewpoints from entering the front doors of the court. When we do get through we are harassed by means of the timing of orders and one-sided enforcement of procedural requirements.

Georgia is an example of what is happening across our country. Laws are being blatantly ignored by those in high office, while other laws are being used to punish their political opponents. This type of corruption reflects the practices historically found in third world nations, dictatorships, and communist tyrannies. Freedom cannot survive where such practices go unpunished.

Yet it is practically impossible to punish individuals holding high office. This is why such individuals must have honor, allowing them to resist their own selfish temptations. Unfortunately America’s high offices are now populated by corrupt people with no moral compass. Our leaders have no honor. Our Founding Fathers are being proven correct, once again.   

Our opponents are trying to frustrate and exhaust us to the point that we will give up. They don’t want their bias and dishonor to be seen in the light of day.  The corrupt individuals in high office are harassing us for our efforts. This tells us that we are having an effect. Even when we don’t win a legal battle, our efforts shine the light of truth on their corruption. That corruption is responding by lashing out at us.

We will be appealing the Georgia Superior Court’s ruling. But we need your help. We need your help to keep the spotlight on the dishonorable actions of those in high office. Please do what you can to support Liberty Legal Foundation.

In Liberty,

Van Irion, Founder
LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION

Malihi, Kemp issue final decision on Obama eligibility case, to appeal

ATLANTA – On Tuesday morning, Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp (r) issued a final decision, adopting Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi’s initial decision contending President Barack Obama meets the eligibility requirements to appear on Presidential Preference Primary ballot.

On Friday, Feb. 3, Malihi issued his decision in three challenges to Barack Obama’s eligibility.

During the Jan. 26 hearing Malihi noted neither Obama nor his Attorney Michael Jablonski appeared or answered and said ordinarily the court would enter a default judgment against a party that fails to participate in any stage of the proceeding.

“Nonetheless, despite defendant’s failure to appear, plaintiffs asked this court to decide the case on the merits of their arguments and evidence,” wrote Malihi, adding, “The court granted plaintiffs’ request.”

Malihi (l) also said, “By deciding this matter on the merits, the court in no way condones the conduct or legal scholarship of defendant’s attorney, Mr. Jablonski,” and stated his decision was based entirely on the law as well as the evidence and legal arguments presented.

His order was in two parts.

The first part addressed plaintiffs David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by Attorney Orly Taitz.

The second part addressed all the plaintiffs, including those represented by Taitz as well as plaintiff David Welden, represented by Attorney Van Irion, and plaintiffs Carl Swensen and Kevin Powell, represented by Attorney Mark Hatfield.

In Part I, Malihi basically discredited the eight witnesses and said he found their testimony, as well as the exhibits tendered, “to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations.”

He stated, “None of the testifying witnesses provided persuasive testimony,” and said none of the written submissions had any probative value.

In conclusion, Malihi stated, “Given the unsatisfactory evidence presented by the plaintiffs, the court concludes that plaintiffs’ claims are not persuasive.”

In Part II, Malihi addressed the claim that Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States and is, therefore, ineligible to run in Georgia’s presidential primary election.

Malihi said he considered, for the purpose of analysis, the following facts: 1) Obama was born in the United States; 2) Obama’s mother was a citizen of the United States at the time of birth; and 3) Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen.

It was the plaintiff’s contention, because Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth, Obama is constitutionally ineligible for the office of President of the United States.
Malihi said, “The court does not agree.”

Citing a 2009 Indiana Court of Appeals case, Arkeny (sic) [Ankeny] v. Governor of Indiana, in which plaintiffs argued “there’s a very clear distinction between ‘citizen of the United States’ and ‘natural born citizen’ and the difference involves having [two] parents of U.S. citizenship, owing no foreign allegiance.”

Pointing out the Indiana court rejected the argument that Obama was ineligible, Malihi stated, “[C]hildren born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents,” and said, “This court finds the decision and analysis of Arkeny (sic) [Ankeny] persuasive.”

While plaintiffs argued the term natural born citizen was defined in 1875 in Minor v. Happersett, Malihi said the Indiana court explained that Minor did not define natural born citizen.

He went on to say, “In deciding whether a woman was eligible to vote, the Minor court merely concluded that children born in a country of parents who were its citizens would qualify as natural born, and this court agrees. The Minor court left open the issue of whether a child born within the United States of alien parent(s) is a natural born citizen.”

Citing United States v. Wong Kim Ark, with which the Indiana court agreed, Malihi said the court extensively examined the common law of England in its decision and concluded Wong Kim Ark, who was born in the United States to alien parents, became a citizen of the United States at the time of his birth.

Malihi stated, “The Indiana court determined that a person qualifies as a natural born citizen if he was born in the United States because he became a United States citizen at birth.”

He wrote, “For the purposes of this analysis, this court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny (sic) [Ankeny], he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen,” and concluded, “President Barack Obama is eligible for the presidential primary election under O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b).

Using Malihi’s analysis, anyone born in the United States is a natural born citizen.

In other words, according to Malihi, children born within the United States to illegal aliens, tourists and/or terrorists are natural born citizens and are, therefore, eligible to become President of the United States.

Malihi’s conclusion is more analogous to saying: All dogs are mammals and all cats are mammals and therefore, all cats are dogs.

Over the weekend, Taitz filed a petition with Kemp to set aside the recommendation issued by Malihi and find Obama ineligible to appear as a candidate for President of the United States on the Georgia ballot.

Taitz cited a 2000 Georgia case, Haynes v. Wells, which she said establishes the precedent “that a candidate seeking to hold office through an election in the state has the affirmative duty to prove their eligibility.”

Taitz said a 2008 Malihi decision in O’Brien V. Gross, from which she quoted, “The burden of proof is entirely upon respondent to establish affirmatively his eligibility for office,” relied on Haynes.

Since neither Obama nor Jablonski appeared, Taitz asked, “On what basis did Judge Malihi consider Obama to be born in this country? Did he consider him born in this country based on his wild imagination? The only thing Obama provided was an empty chair. Did the empty chair testify under penalty of perjury in front of Judge Malihi … that Obama was born in this country? Did the empty chair provide Malihi with any evidence, with the original birth certificate or a certified copy?”

Taitz went on to state Malihi’s reliance on Ankeny “is a  travesty of justice and an embarrassment to the state of Georgia.”

Taitz stated Malihi was required to base his decision on what was in the record and his introduction of an obscure Indiana case was used to advocate for Obama rather than judge the case on the record at hand.

Hatfield sent a letter to Kemp via e-mail prior to Kemp issuing his final decision to point out “several significant flaws in Judge Malihi’s findings and conclusions.”

On behalf of his clients, Hatfield requested that Kemp render a decision that treats Obama no different than any other candidate seeking access to the Georgia ballot that fails and refuses to present evidence of his or her qualifications for holding office and disregards the authority of our judiciary.

Now that Kemp has issued a final decision in the matter, Hatfield stated, “[W]e are going full bore and taking it up on appeal.”

Irion has also indicated his client will be filing an appeal. 

Van Irion on Obama Eligibility: Is our Judicial Branch dead?

One of my earliest childhood memories is of my parents talking about Nixon and the Watergate scandal. I remember the newspaper headline: “Nixon Resigns!” President Nixon’s fight against court subpoenas made international news. Yesterday President Obama completely ignored a court subpoena, and the world shrugged.

Obama’s behavior yesterday is even more disturbing than Nixon’s. Nixon at least respected the judicial branch enough to have his attorney’s show up in court and follow procedure. Nixon’s fight in the courts followed existing law. Nixon acknowledged the authority of the judicial branch even while he fought it. Obama, on the other hand, essentially said yesterday that the judicial branch has no power over him. He ordered his attorneys to stay away from the hearing. He didn’t petition a higher court in a legitimate attempt to stay the hearing. Instead he showed complete contempt for the entire judicial branch and for the rule of law. Rather than respecting the legal process, Obama went around the courts and tried to put political pressure directly on the Georgia Secretary of State. When that failed, he simply ignored the judicial branch completely.

The rule of law, and our three-branch system of government, now hang in the balance. If the Georgia court issues a ruling on the merits and an order finding Obama in contempt of court, and if that contempt order actually results in real punishment of some kind, then we will still have a Constitutional Republic. If this doesn’t happen, then Obama will have been rewarded for showing complete contempt for the judicial branch.

Understand that the goal of the Georgia ballot challenge was to have a court rule on the merits of the Constitutional question: Does the term “natural born citizen” in Article II of the Constitution require a Presidential candidate to have two parents that were U.S. citizens at the time the candidate was born? Obama wants to avoid having a court rule on this question. That is why he didn’t show up and ordered his attorneys to not show up. Obama was hoping that the Georgia court would enter a default judgment rather than rule on the merits. If the court enters a default judgment, Obama will have succeeded in avoiding the Constitutional eligibility question. He will then appeal the default judgment, get the appellate court to suspend the default judgment pending appeal, and then delay the appeal until after the primary. This is undoubtedly Obama’s plan.

If the Georgia Court rules that Supreme Court precedent must be followed and therefore Obama simply does not meet the minimum Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President, then we will at least have succeeded in finding one court in the nation willing to do its job. If that court finds Obama in contempt of court, then we still have three viable branches of government. The Georgia court has the authority to do both of these things. The world should be holding its breath.

Unfortunately the world is apparently unaware that our great Republic is on life support. The Roman Empire died a slow death. It’s death was so gradual that few people living at that time probably noticed the individual events that marked the death throes of that great empire. Apparently the same is true of America. Yesterday marked a stunning turn of events in the constant power struggle between the three branches of our government. Our President openly showed that he believes he is completely above the law. I wonder if the court even noticed its own death certificate. We will see in a few days.

I will certainly try to explain this to the court in our proposed findings of fact and law that the court requested we file before February 5th. Please pray with me that Judge Malihi rules on the merits of our case.

All of your encouragement and prayers have been greatly appreciated. They are needed even more over the next few weeks. This battle is FAR from over. And it has taken on importance beyond what we predicted (which is truly astounding). Please tell everyone you know about Obama’s contempt of the judicial branch. Please explain to them what it really means. Even those that agree with Obama politically and disagree with our ballot challenge should be shocked, appalled, and scared of Obama’s contempt for the judicial system.

In Liberty,

Van Irion

“No show” Obama and counsel in contempt for failing to appear in eligibility case

In Atlanta Georgia today Barrack Hussein Obama fails to appear in court after multiple warnings from Judge Malihi and the Secretary of State of Georgia warn him he will be ignoring the courts “at his own peril!”

Shortly after 8 am I arrive at 230 Peachtree street, suite 850. It was evident at first that if the fake president did show up with his attorney he would be well protected!

I stepped off the elevator and blue shirts were all over the place! Georgia State patrol, various building security and lots of people walking around talking in their sleeves! The Attorney General of Georgia was rumored to be in attendance and the extra security was well warranted!

It was evident that the theme of the added security was to be cordial! The gentlemen in blue were just that, nice and going out of their way to be nice and accommodating.

I was allowed to bring my camera in and one even said as he saw a small wad of my cash being emptied into the small bowl before being passed through said, “put that money back in your pocket, if the politicians show up they may take it from you! As I passed through the scanner he went on to say “you can’t pass through unless you say Go Dawgs”, I did so and we chuckled!

I slowly walk into a small room that was quickly filling with interested observers! The press setting up in the back, several reporters, cameramen making their way around the room taking pics and rolling video of the historical moment.

It was hot already, a little beyond my comfort zone but the anticipation of events outweighed my concern over the temperature of the room. A lady across the aisle from me was fanning with a newspaper to stay cooler and the click of the paper was becoming very familiar and a tad irritating! I regained focus and continued to observe the scurry in the room.

I sit down with my buddy Will Sturtevant in the 4th row behind the empty seats of Barrack Obama and his attorney Michael Joblonsky! A stir starts spreading around the room much like the scent from a burning incense stick ” will he show?” Will he fill the seat and bless us with his presence?

It became all too apparent that he was going to be a “no show” as time quickly passed. A few in the know began disseminating new that he was in fact a no show and the room relaxed and sighed a little.

0907, Judge Malihi calls all counsel for a side bar in his chambers! Although the content of that conversation was not revealed till later that afternoon with brunch at a Irish pub with Will and Van Irion. Van stated the judge wanted to enter into a “default judgement” which would have ended the case with a judgement against Obama and every one would have to go home even before it started. Van told me, “this is a familiar move by judges when you have the circumstances such as this, a no show!

He requests a default judgement and everyone gets to go home early, woo hoo!” Van was concerned as well as the others that not only did alot of people prepare many hours for this case but many people came from all over to see this case and they were here to see a hearing!”

He also went on to add that with all the evidence to be submitted it would be advantageous to put on record all of the evidence against Obama, to have a record of it, not merely mentioning it in a default judgement! This leads me to believe future cases can simply refer to these documents as being attached to an actual case building the case against Obama! Gentlemen, start your engines!!!

With the realization that Obama and his attorneys were not going to show up for a hearing the mood changed from “will we get to see the King squirm as hours of evidence is displayed sat to why he is not a natural citizen born in the US or perhaps an illegal immigrant with no traceable birth certificate or social security card a to “game time!”

Now that all the attempts by Obama to quash and dismiss the subpoena and hearing have failed and the fake President didn’t get his way, displaying to the courts he considers himself above the law and the Constitution the president decides to pull a “George Jones” and “no shows!”

I watched as the attorneys filed back into the room and all had agreed in the absence of the defendants they would shorten their delivery of evidence and their argument to around 30 minutes a piece! So at the 20 minutes before 10 am the hearing begins!

Van Irion takes the helm and begins his opening remarks and submission of vital pieces of evidence. As documented on the You tube video titled Obama eligibility hearing. He pulled several witnesses to the stand and questioned them with different items for submission to the courts. Fake birth certificates to Obamas own admissions in His book “Dreams of the father.

While Van was showing a short presentation with his well prepared board display on the meaning of the constitutional phrase “natural citizen” he began his closing remarks stating that he was disappointed with Mr Obama no showing and he should be held in contempt for his failure to appear, Judge Malihi abruptly told Van, interrupting his presentation, that as he was setting up his next statement to build a case against Obama for contempt the judge interjected that he was here to hear the evidence not pursue contempt charges at this time, at least that was what I took from the quick spurt of words.

In an after hearing lunch at Meehans over fish and chips van told me he was just about to to suggest that this was perhaps an impeachable offense. But we never go to that point but perhaps that will be pursued in the near future.

As the morning turned into marathon of data, the next attorney displayed his evidence and witnesses spike eloquently as the natural citizen case was building against the fake president, the Manchurian President!

As he finished with his presentation, Attorney Orly Taitz started, a tall blonde with a thick accent began her delivery with a video about Obamas signature on a school registry in Kenya where the fake president signed his name as Barry Sortero!

This was terribly interesting to me but was once again Judge Malihi told that this was irrelevant and that she make her point without the video! She turns to the crowd and starts speaking to them at which point the Judge asks her to address the court and not the crowd! She quickly realized this was going to be a case under great scrutiny as her voice began to crack with the anticipation that she was going to be held to the facts only which is what needed to be done adding only to the intensity of the moment!

As she was being reprimanded, a small group of attorneys exits out the back as the judge clamps down on the presenters of information!

There was a clear line in the room being drawn in the room that the first two cases were similar and the last speaker was more focused on the “birther issue” that has garnered much attention over the last year.

The delineating line that was established by the quick departure of the legal teams was the perception in the room by those left in attendance was the first two cases had their path and the last were reflective of another path, both very well presented but the difference apparent.

As the entourage exited the room and slowly filed down into the building corridor a few reporters along with staff of Bradley County News followed the attorneys and witnesses for a follow up question and answer session!

The tweets and Facebook messages started showing up on my phone! “Where is the Prez?” “Why didn’t he show?”

The fake president did not show and one attorney submitted the presidents itinerary for the day from the White House website and their was not a thing on it, completely empty! This led many in the courtroom the impression that Obama could have attended the hearing. It was reported the prior day that he would be in Las Vegas for the day!

The evidence is this! The president will go out of his way to make a concerted effort to go on multiple vacations with ease, play golf and basketball anywhere but when the “People of the US” call on him he no shows and is in contempt!

The fake president has spent millions of dollars to hide his records and has intentionally made it extremely difficult to gain information on who the person is that is sitting in the highest seat in the nation and arguably the Worl! Who is he? Who is this man? Where is he from? Who does he represent? Who are his parents? Why was he allowed to be certified by the RNC and the DNC? What is his purpose? Why are we allowing an undocumented person to inhabit the White House? There is a higher element at work here that even puzzles the best of them? Is this supposed to happen? Some pre-determined curse or the plan for the end to play out? Are we supposed to watch as it pans out in full view? I don’t have the answers but I can assure you it will reveal itself in the coming months and it will be ugly and sinister! I’m going with intuition and my gut here, mark my word!

Let me note that on the RNC/DNC certification it didn’t mention as it should he was constitutionally certified instead it just said certified! That was a wow moment in the courtroom.

I just witnessed history in the making? What happened today will make or break this country! We either have a constitution or not! We have a fake president that does not acknowledge the constitution or we have a constitutionally certified president! We as a civil democracy cannot have both! In a free America there is only room for us to be governed by strict adherence to the Constitution! Only when we get mixed up in the details and start destroying the foundations of our country do we see the opposite effect!

This president has made it no secret that he is not a fan of the constitution, even calling it irrelevant and outdated. We have a fake president that does not love this country and has spent many countless hours trying to destroy it!

This was never more evident than today when he flat out refused to obey the subpoena to appear and did an end around the Constitution!

There is only one president that would do what he did today and that is one that is not loyal to his country and has no allegiance or concern for its well being! He is afterall an undocumented, illegal immigrant and somehow has captured America with his spell and outmaneuvered the constitution and all it’s restraints our forefathers put in place to prevent this very action I have witnessed today!

Our forefathers, many years ago wrote the constitution to protect us from subversives such as this and put plenty of safeguards in place to prevent this hijacking of America by a subversive with many deep seated secrets that will only be revealed completely ath the “right time!” We now stand at the precipice of our collapse and are now asking the million dollar questions how and why did this happen! Our constitution was trampled upon today and it completely surprises me that we are not screaming in the streets today! Perhaps we are in the throws of Socialism or communism? Perhaps, I am enveloped and am simy not aware of it encompassing grip! Maybe the day has passed when the greatest country on Earth is no more! Have we slept one day too long!

When as a kid my grandma used to sit me on her lap and repeat to me! There does not have to be rhyme or reason or a method to the madness, just realize that it exists and confront the evil that permeates from any entity! We, child, I am afraid are seeing the collapse of our nation! A return to a Godless society pitted with the essence of evil!

The purposeful evasion of a sitting president to spend millions to hide his identity speaks volume of the sinister plan he ha for our country! Without the plan being revealed, you just know it aunt good! What is he hiding? I believe the reveal is certain in short time! This is bigger than we know! I am convinced he is in the White House for more sinister reasons than we can imagine!

So with another no show under his belt and another nose up to the American people we move forward with caution as “no show” Obama once again shows his true colors! A Marcist/Socialist with a definite plan to undermine and destroy out country! He can and will be held in contempt for his reckless activity! If we assist our elected officials with assuring them they must be also adherent to the guidelines place in that ole document and example we can set in place a standard with binds that cant be broken.

Can we put him in shackles and deport him out of the country for his contemptuous relationship with the court system? I don’t have the quick answer, but his boldness and his recent actions gives every implication to me that he believes you can’t! That people is the truest dilemma!

Put him in cuffs? Realistically, probably not! But he and anyone else that may occupy the White jouse ot an elected office must know that the possibility exists if you stomp on the constitution and no show a state court! The message must be clear, contempt and a blatant disregard for all things that are not American will not be tolerated inside this great republic! We no longer have the desire of another King George! One dictator in our American past was not tolerated by the American people.

Another arrogant, pompous and aristocratic King like personality will not be tolerated!

ABC NEWS: Ga. Judge Orders President to Appear at Hearing ( to face off with Van Irion)

Its short, sweet and simple! The article below that is! It is in typical fashion of the leftist news corps! Oh, if I must report it let’s discredit everyone around and allow the case! After all, the King must not be disturbed from his daily affairs! Oh the peasants are stirring it up again!!! Off with their heads! Tax their death and place my trash upon their graves! Please allow me to be in the presence of this ABC reporter who is so inconvenienced to tell this story! Good day!

Ga. Judge Orders President to Appear at Hearing
January 20, 2012

A judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen and can’t be president.

It’s one of many such lawsuits that have been filed across the country, so far without success. A Georgia resident made the complaint, which is intended to keep Obama’s name off the state’s ballot in the March presidential primary.

An Obama campaign aide says any attempt to involve the president personally will fail and such complaints around the country have no merit.

The hearing is set for Thursday before an administrative judge. Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi on Friday denied a motion by the president’s lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to show up.

Judge whacks Obama over eligibility: The POTUS goes down to Georgia

Obama went down to Georgia and he was in bind and way behind looking for an election to steal! He came upon Van Irion sitting on a stump, he said boy let me tell you what! I’m the best election stealer in the world! I bet you this election box made of gold, Im the best there ever was!!! Round the mountain run boy run, devils in the white house with the election won! Your busy in the briar patch handing out dough…..I’ll bet you once you son of a buck, your butt will be in Georgia showing your true identity! Ok, that was a poor attempt at a Charlie Daniel classic! But, the POTUS OBAMA WILL BE MAKING HIS WAY TO GEORGIA THIS WEEK TO FACE OFF WITH VAN IRION! This is going to be fun!

WORLD NET DAILY REPORTS:

A Georgia judge has refused a demand from Barack Obama to quash a subpoena to appear at a series of administration hearings Jan. 26 at which residents of the state are challenging, as allowed under a state law, his name on the 2012 presidential ballot.

WND reported this week when Obama outlined a defense strategy for a number of state-level challenges to his candidacy in 2012 which argue that states have nothing to do with the eligibility of presidential candidates.

“Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates,” Obama’s lawyer argued in a motion to quash a subpoena for him to appear at the hearings in Atlanta Jan. 26.

“The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant,” the lawyer said.

Judge Michael M. Malihi, however, took a different view.

“Defendant argues that ‘if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as president of the United States’ to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend,” he wrote in his order, released today.

“Defendant’s motion suggests that no president should be compelled to attend a court hearing. This may be correct. But defendant has failed to enlighten the court with any legal authority,” the judge continued.

“Specifically, defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony … [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.’”

Hearings have been scheduled for three separate complaints raised against Obama’s candidacy. They all are raised by Georgia residents who are challenging Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot for various reasons, which they are allowed to do under state law.

It is states, usually through the office of secretary of state, that run elections, not the federal government. The national election is simply a compilation of the results of the individual elections within states.

The schedule for the hearings was set by Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings. In Georgia, a state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”

State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.

Three different plaintiffs’ groups are lined up for separate hearings, including one represented by California attorney Orly Taitz. She had the judge sign a subpoena for Obama’s testimony, and Michael Jablonski, Obama’s attorney for the cases, argued that he should be exempted.

“Make no mistake about it. This is the beginning of Watergate Two or ObamaForgeryGate. I believe this is the second time in the U.S. history a sitting president is ordered to comply with a subpoena, and produce documents, which might eventually bring criminal charges to the president and a number of high-ranking individuals,” Taitz said.

She told WND that it’s been 40 years since any court issued such a ruling concerning a president.

Separately, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona told WND he also had gotten a subpoena to be at the hearings in Georgia. He said the goal apparently is to ask him about his Cold Case Posse investigation of Obama’s eligiblity, but he said since the investigation remains open, he wouldn’t be able to say much about it.

Citizens bringing the complaints include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by Taitz; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield.

Hatfield also had filed with the court a “Notice to Produce” asking for Obama’s documents and records.

He wants one of the two original certified copies of Obama’s  long-form birth certificate.

Also, required are medical, religious administrative and other records about Obama’s birth; passports, applications and related records; college and university applications; bar association applications and materials; details on the citizenship of Obama’s father and other documents.

Taitz had filed an opposition to the motion to quash, taking Obama directly to task over what many consider an important constitutional question – the eligibility of a presidential candidate.

“It is noteworthy, that [the quash request] comes on the heels of his extended 17 day Hawaiian vacation, which cost U.S. taxpayers 4 million dollars. Mr. Obama has earned a dubious distinction as a Vacationer in Chief, Tourist in Chief, Partier in Chief and a Golfer in Chief due to his endless vacations, parties and rounds of golf. Considering … it is not too much to ask for Mr. Obama to show up once at a hearing and present his original identification records, which were not seen by anyone in the country yet,” she argued.

Obama’s attorney, Jablonski, also had argued that the state should mind its own business.

“The sovereignty of the state of Georgia does not extend beyond the limits of the State. … Since the sovereignty of the state does not extend beyond its territorial limits, an administrative subpoena has no effect,” the filing argues.

Taitz’s supporters joined a discussion on her website, where she also solicits support for the expenses of the battles she’s confronting, judging that Obama is on the defensive.

“What a joke. He claims to be too busy performing the duties of the president of the United States. How many days of vacation has he taken? How many rounds of golf? If he is too busy to provide the documents that provide the basis for meeting the requirements of the office, then perhaps he better sit out the next four years,” said one.

Wrote another, “The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant. … This is complete utter nonsense!”

In fact, a presidential elector in California brought a lawsuit challenging Obama’s eligibility at the time of the 2008 election and was told the dispute was not yet ripe because the inauguration hadn’t taken place. The courts later ruled that the elector lost his “standing” to bring the lawsuit after the inauguration.

Barack Obama
Irion said his argument is that the Founders clearly considered a “natural born citizen,” as the Constitution requires of a president and no one else, to be the offspring of two citizen parents. Since Obama himself has written in his books that his father, Barack Obama Sr. was a Kenyan, and thus subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom, Irion argues that Obama is disqualified under any circumstances based on his own testimony.

Those who argue against his birth in the United States note that numerous experts have given testimony and sworn statements that they believe Obama’s Hawaiian birth documentation to be fraudulent.

It is that concern that also has prompted Arpaio to turn over an investigation of that issue to his Cold Case Posse. Its investigative report is expected to be released in the next few weeks.

The Georgia hearing apparently will be the first time among dozens of so-far unsuccessful lawsuits brought over Obama’s eligibility issue that evidence will be heard in a court. Other cases all have been dismissed over issues such as standing, without a presentation of the evidence.

There are similar challenges to Obama’s 2012 candidacy being raised before state election or other commissions in Tennessee, Arizona, Illinois, New Hampshire and other states.

The image released by the White House in April:

Obama long-form birth certificate released April 27 by the White House
Top constitutional expert Herb Titus contends that a “natural born citizen”  is born of parents who are citizens. That argument also is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett in 1875. The case includes one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen.”

That case states:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

An extensive analysis of the issue was conducted by Titus, who has taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. He also was the founding dean of the College of Law at Regent University, a trial attorney and special assistant U.S. attorney in the Department of Justice.

“‘Natural born citizen’ in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning,” he said. “Another way of putting it; there is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations.”

If you “go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that’s precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country,” he said.

“Now what we’ve learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president.”