"Read all about it"

Posts Tagged ‘Van IRION’

Anti NDAA Bill- Empower our local Sherriff to stop Feds from arresting you

In Government on February 7, 2012 at 10:38 AM

Action Needed: HB2619 in the House Judiciary committee this week.

Tomorrow, Wednesday, February 8th 2012, the vote will happen! I keep hearing “just tell me what to do?” Here is a very simple way to get involved!

Make seven calls to these seven elected officials, pass it along to seven (more is preferred), encourage seven others. Make the calls/emails to the people below and tell whomever answers the phone that you support HB 2619 and you want to empower the local Sherriff to be the only one that has any legal authority to arrest you and not some power hungry federal agent from DC!

The National Defense Authorization Act is a very scary bill signed into law on New Years Eve by a very unconstitutional president while you were busy bringing in the New Year! If that is not subversive I don’t know what it is!

In a nut shell, a provision inside NDAA gives federal agents the right to arrest any citizen of the United States, for any reason, no trial, shipped off to Guantanomo or worse and no one in the state has to know anything! There currently is no way to stop them! This bill will, at least give us some defense from them swooping in and hauling you off! For real guys! I’m not making this up! Our elected federal officials voted for this horrendous bill! Now, let’s shut down it’s ability to arrest you! Don’t hesitate!

Time to act patriots! Burn up the lines! Shut down the switchboard! Please don’t sit back and wait for someone else to do it! It want get done and just by sheer numbers if you dont, thousands may miss out on the chance to stop the ill effects of NDAA!

Take 10 minutes out of your day!

If you don’t know who your local Sherriffs are, I would suggest you get warm and cozy with them! They are the only ones, with this bill, that stands between you and the Feds arresting you for no cause whatsoever, other than they don’t like what you have to say!

I’m sitting here thinking, why am I begging my 13,000 plus readers to make a few calls and emails to stop this! Why am I not walking out into the street around the courthouse joining them in protest and …..loudly! It is what it is! Let’s get busy! We can make change! Remember, it only takes a few tireless warriors to keep the flames of liberty burning!

Here is the formal Legalese of HB2619:

HB2619:  Criminal Procedure – As introduced, provides that a federal employee who is not designated as a Tennessee peace officer may not make an arrest or conduct a search and seizure in this state without the written permission of the sheriff of the county in which the arrest, search and seizure will take place except under certain circumstances.

A call to action from Van Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation:

Please contact these 7 people right now and politely ask them to support House Bill 2619. If you don’t know what to say just tell the person that answers the phone that you support House Bill 2619. If they ask any questions about the bill just tell them that HB2619 is the Law Enforcement Communications Act and that Constitutional Attorney Van Irion will be at Wednesday’s committee meeting to answer any of their questions.

We need you to make 7 phone calls or send 7 e-mails, right now. Please contact the members of the Tennessee House Judiciary subcommittee and politely tell them that you support HB2619. Here are their names, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses:

Judd Matheny, (615) 253-0226, rep.judd.matheny@capitol.tn.gov

Karen Camper, (615) 253-0211, rep.karen.camper@capitol.tn.gov

Eddie Bass, (615) 741-1864, rep.eddie.bass@capitol.tn.gov

Eric Watson, (615) 253-0252, rep.eric.watson@capitol.tn.gov

Jon Lundberg, (615) 741-7623, rep.jon.lundberg@capitol.tn.gov

Barrett Rich, (615) 253-0380, rep.barrett.rich@capitol.tn.gov

Janis Sontary, (615) 741-6861, rep.janis.sontary@capitol.tn.gov

Georgia court ignores basic rules of interpretation

In Government on February 6, 2012 at 8:16 AM

From the moment I saw Judge Malihi I could tell something was not right!

I had read his many opinions, I was encouraged by them, I believe Van was too! Loads of optimism abounded from the realization that a State Judge would finally stand up to a runaway government using the Constitution to render a decision based on the words in the Constitution. We were hoping that this Judge would interpret the Constitution in a way that would push back a runaway president and his oppressive government. To possibly prevent a socialist progressive from ascending to the highest office in the land! That was evidently not going to happen!

I knew while herding the attorneys in his side chambers to request a default judgement that we were in for long morning, but, I remained hopeful.

This judge did not rule by the law or his real beliefs! When he returned from the side bar he was almost despondent, mad, like a child with a dilemma and now has a tough decision to make. After the side bar conversation he seemed confrontational as if contemplating his next move to appease a very encroaching POTUS!

The tone in the courtroom was different when he reentered! I could tell someone or some element of the machine had tapped into his pockets and this man was doing something he deeply didn’t believe in or was being whipped into shape by unseen force. A quagmire of sorts he has allowed himself to retreat too and be trapped within! A dilemma I hope I never have to face because it means I have to give up on my core beliefs and values and tread among the communists and Socialists that have plans for this country way beyond what I care to comprehend!

His almost constant, disinterested gaze off to his right showed me dishonesty and that he was perhaps in his mind fighting a thought process he was not accustomed to dealing with! The jut of his chin forward and his quick scolding remarks when our attorneys would pry into sensitive areas that may have perhaps revealed more than our naive public or media could comprehend!

Perhaps a position somewhere inside the fed, a lump of cash! Follow this guy! I believe his career is very bright within the fed and the OBAMA administration. Look for Secretary of State Kemps career to take off real soon too. Mark my word!

Breaking News, although I’m not sure how breaking it is anymore, our judicial system is dead. Our constitution has been rendered as parchment only and our America is well on her way to becoming controlled by a Socialist/Marxist regime!

These are my thoughts and in no way reflect the opinion of Liberty Legal Foundation, this is my blog, my thoughts only, although I feel the sentiment may be echoed in other venues! Have a great day!

Georgia Court ignores basic rules of interpretation
2/5/2012

By now many of you have probably heard that the Georgia court ruled that Obama is a natural born citizen. (Link to opinion) More importantly it ruled that any person born on U.S. soil is a natural born citizen. According to the Georgia court, a woman from any country can visit the U.S. for one day, give birth, take the baby back to any country to be raised under any culture, and that baby can return as an adult, live here for 14 years and run for President. The end result of this ruling is outrageous. It runs contrary to common sense as well as to established law.

So, what happened in Georgia? The court determined that a clear definition of natural born citizen from Supreme Court precedent was overturned by dicta in another Supreme Court case. Precedent is any statement by the court that is pivotal to reaching the court’s ruling. Dicta is the opposite of precedent. Dicta is a statement by the court about matters that are not pivotal to reaching its ruling. Dicta is persuasive, but it cannot overturn precedent.

In other words, the Georgia court violated a basic rule of legal interpretation by ruling as it did. But wait, there’s more! The Georgia court also violated rules of Constitutional interpretation that have been around since the earliest Supreme Court. Our first Chief Justice explained that no part of the Constitution should be interpreted in a way that leaves any other part of the Constitution without independent meaning. By ruling that anyone born on U.S. soil can run for President the Georgia court concluded that the 14th Amendment was intended to alter article II of the Constitution. Such an interpretation is 180 degrees in opposite to Chief Justice Marshall’s explanation of how to interpret the Constitution.

But WAIT, there’s more! In order to reach this conclusion the Georgia court ALSO had to disregard yet another part of the holding from the Minor v. Happersett Supreme Court ruling. Even if you ignore the rules of Constitutional construction and the rule that dicta can’t overturn precedent, even if you agree with the Georgia court that the definition of natural born citizen in the Minor decision was dicta, you still can’t reach the Georgia court’s ruling. You see, the Minor Court ALSO explicitly ruled that the 14th Amendment didn’t create any new privileges and immunities. So, if a person couldn’t run for President before the 14th Amendment, they couldn’t run for President after the 14th Amendment. This means that the Minor Court explicitly ruled that the 14th amendment didn’t alter the definition of natural born citizen under article II of the Constitution. Yet the Georgia court ignored this Supreme Court ruling as well.

The Georgia court was aware of all of these arguments because these arguments were made at the January 26 hearing and they were included in our written brief after the hearing. Yet the Georgia court’s ruling only addresses one of these three arguments and poorly at that.

The one point of good news from this ruling is that we have FINALLY gotten a court to rule on the merits of our argument. This may seem like a hollow victory, but it isn’t. Before this everyone that has brought a challenge against Obama’s eligibility has been dismissed on procedural grounds. Nothing is more devastating to the rule of law than a judicial branch that refuses to do its job. Before this case we had courts across the country telling Americans that they had no right to enforce the Constitution. That was absurdity at its most extreme. Liberty Legal Foundation found a case that we believed would at least get a ruling on the merits. We hate the ruling we got, but at least we got a ruling. Now we can appeal that ruling. The appeals process now will focus on the definition of “natural born citizen” rather than procedure for the first time since the issue of Obama’s eligibility was raise in 2008.

For all the reasons I’ve mentioned in this message, we will be appealing the Georgia Court’s ruling. We will continue to fight for Constitutional rule of law. Failing that we will continue to force Courts to show their true colors. If our judicial branch will not uphold the rule of law, that fact needs to be exposed to the harsh light of day for all the world to see.

In Liberty,

Dawn Irion
 
Co-Founder
LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION

NDAA Nullification: Tennessee Bills Propose Kidnapping Charges for Federal Agents

In Government on February 3, 2012 at 4:34 PM

The Tenth Amendment Center is leading the charge to assist our State Legislators in nullifying one of the biggest encroachments on our liberties of all time and they need your help! HB1629 and SB2669 are two very strong ways to empower your local Sherrif to protect you! The Sherrif has more power to halt the Feds from touching you than even he may know! Call your State Representatives and State Senator right now and tell them you want them and others to jump on board with these bills! Don’t wait for someone else to do it! It’s up to you! These guys are putting their necks out for you it’s time we show them huge support for their efforts!

Link to all TN Representatives: (Copy and paste to search) http://www.capitol.tn.gov/

My 24 th District Tn State Representative is Kevin Brooks email or call him at: rep.kevin.brooks@capitol.tn.gov or call at (615) 741-1350

State Representative Eric Watson: mailto:rep.eric.watson@capitol.tn.gov

9th District State Senator Mike Bell: sen.mike.bell@capitol.tn.gov

State and local resistance to the detention provisions contained in the National Defense Authorization Act continues to grow, rapidly emerging as a nationwide movement.

The Tennessee legislature will consider HB1629 and SB2669 in the 2012 session. The legislation would effectively nullify the detention provisions in the NDAA and would also require federal agents making an arrest in the Volunteer State for any reason to first obtain written permission from the county sheriff.

This bill declares that any federal law purporting to require local or state law enforcement agencies to act at the direction of the federal government or the United States military is beyond the authority granted to the federal government pursuant to the United States Constitution, is not recognized by this state, is specifically rejected by this state and is declared to be invalid in this state. This bill further declares that any federal law purporting to give federal agents or employees, including any members of the United States military, the authority of any state or local law enforcement agency of this state, without the express permission of this state, is beyond the authority granted to the federal government pursuant to the United States Constitution, is not recognized by this state, is specifically rejected by this state, and is declared to be invalid in this state.

The act takes aim at indefinite detention provisions in the NDAA. Tenth Amendment Center communications director Mike Maharrey called language in the NDAA vague and overbroad, pointing out that Americans should never simply trust in the good intentions and moral clarity of the president or federal judges to protect their rights.

“It falls on the states to step in and protect their citizens,” he said. “I can’t imagine a more clear-cut application of state and local interposition as a check on federal power. What could be a more palpable, deliberate and dangerous unconstitutional act than the federal government indefinitely detaining an American citizen without due process?”

The Tennessee bill also “makes it a Class E felony for any official, agent, or employee of the United States government to enforce or attempt to enforce any federal law, order, rule or regulation that is beyond the authority granted to the federal government pursuant to the United States Constitution,” and includes provisions for kidnapping charges if a federal agent were to detain a U.S. citizen in Tennessee under the NDAA.

Rep. Bill Dunn (R-Knoxville) and Rep. Cameron Sexton (R-Crossville) sponsor the House version of the bill. Sen. Stacey Campfield (R-Knoxville) sponsors the Senate bill.

The Volunteer state joins Washington and Virginia considering legislation to nullify detention provisions in the NDAA. And local governments have also stepped up, including El Paso and Fremont Counties in Colorado. While some argue the NDAA doesn’t apply to American citizens, Maharrey said that notion should not stop state and local governments from following James Madison’s admonition to interpose and draw a line in the sand.

“If what supporters say is true and the NDAA does not authorize indefinite detention of Americans, what is the harm in this legislation? Why would anybody oppose it? It does nothing but serve notice that state and local officials will not sit back and allow the federal government to exercise unconstitutional powers – powers supporters claim don’t exist anyway. It simply affirms a fence that supposedly already exists. The only rational I can find for opposing this bill is if they really do want the option of detaining Americans without due process to remain open,” he said. “You can only oppose this legislation if you accept the idea that the federal government has the authority to do whatever it wants with absolutely no check on its actions – Constitution be damned. If you ask me, that’s a lot scarier than whatever terrorist threat they claim to be protecting me from.”

TAC executive Michael Boldin said he expects other states to soon follow the lead of Tennessee, Virginia and Washington.

“We have pretty strong indications that Rhode Island, Utah, Maine, New Jersey, Oklahoma and other states will be introducing similar legislation soon. This is just a start – and activists all over the country need to contact state legislators right now to voice their support.”

Van Irion on Obama Eligibility: Is our Judicial Branch dead?

In Government on January 28, 2012 at 12:47 PM

One of my earliest childhood memories is of my parents talking about Nixon and the Watergate scandal. I remember the newspaper headline: “Nixon Resigns!” President Nixon’s fight against court subpoenas made international news. Yesterday President Obama completely ignored a court subpoena, and the world shrugged.

Obama’s behavior yesterday is even more disturbing than Nixon’s. Nixon at least respected the judicial branch enough to have his attorney’s show up in court and follow procedure. Nixon’s fight in the courts followed existing law. Nixon acknowledged the authority of the judicial branch even while he fought it. Obama, on the other hand, essentially said yesterday that the judicial branch has no power over him. He ordered his attorneys to stay away from the hearing. He didn’t petition a higher court in a legitimate attempt to stay the hearing. Instead he showed complete contempt for the entire judicial branch and for the rule of law. Rather than respecting the legal process, Obama went around the courts and tried to put political pressure directly on the Georgia Secretary of State. When that failed, he simply ignored the judicial branch completely.

The rule of law, and our three-branch system of government, now hang in the balance. If the Georgia court issues a ruling on the merits and an order finding Obama in contempt of court, and if that contempt order actually results in real punishment of some kind, then we will still have a Constitutional Republic. If this doesn’t happen, then Obama will have been rewarded for showing complete contempt for the judicial branch.

Understand that the goal of the Georgia ballot challenge was to have a court rule on the merits of the Constitutional question: Does the term “natural born citizen” in Article II of the Constitution require a Presidential candidate to have two parents that were U.S. citizens at the time the candidate was born? Obama wants to avoid having a court rule on this question. That is why he didn’t show up and ordered his attorneys to not show up. Obama was hoping that the Georgia court would enter a default judgment rather than rule on the merits. If the court enters a default judgment, Obama will have succeeded in avoiding the Constitutional eligibility question. He will then appeal the default judgment, get the appellate court to suspend the default judgment pending appeal, and then delay the appeal until after the primary. This is undoubtedly Obama’s plan.

If the Georgia Court rules that Supreme Court precedent must be followed and therefore Obama simply does not meet the minimum Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President, then we will at least have succeeded in finding one court in the nation willing to do its job. If that court finds Obama in contempt of court, then we still have three viable branches of government. The Georgia court has the authority to do both of these things. The world should be holding its breath.

Unfortunately the world is apparently unaware that our great Republic is on life support. The Roman Empire died a slow death. It’s death was so gradual that few people living at that time probably noticed the individual events that marked the death throes of that great empire. Apparently the same is true of America. Yesterday marked a stunning turn of events in the constant power struggle between the three branches of our government. Our President openly showed that he believes he is completely above the law. I wonder if the court even noticed its own death certificate. We will see in a few days.

I will certainly try to explain this to the court in our proposed findings of fact and law that the court requested we file before February 5th. Please pray with me that Judge Malihi rules on the merits of our case.

All of your encouragement and prayers have been greatly appreciated. They are needed even more over the next few weeks. This battle is FAR from over. And it has taken on importance beyond what we predicted (which is truly astounding). Please tell everyone you know about Obama’s contempt of the judicial branch. Please explain to them what it really means. Even those that agree with Obama politically and disagree with our ballot challenge should be shocked, appalled, and scared of Obama’s contempt for the judicial system.

In Liberty,

Van Irion

“No show” Obama and counsel in contempt for failing to appear in eligibility case

In Government on January 27, 2012 at 10:58 AM

In Atlanta Georgia today Barrack Hussein Obama fails to appear in court after multiple warnings from Judge Malihi and the Secretary of State of Georgia warn him he will be ignoring the courts “at his own peril!”

Shortly after 8 am I arrive at 230 Peachtree street, suite 850. It was evident at first that if the fake president did show up with his attorney he would be well protected!

I stepped off the elevator and blue shirts were all over the place! Georgia State patrol, various building security and lots of people walking around talking in their sleeves! The Attorney General of Georgia was rumored to be in attendance and the extra security was well warranted!

It was evident that the theme of the added security was to be cordial! The gentlemen in blue were just that, nice and going out of their way to be nice and accommodating.

I was allowed to bring my camera in and one even said as he saw a small wad of my cash being emptied into the small bowl before being passed through said, “put that money back in your pocket, if the politicians show up they may take it from you! As I passed through the scanner he went on to say “you can’t pass through unless you say Go Dawgs”, I did so and we chuckled!

I slowly walk into a small room that was quickly filling with interested observers! The press setting up in the back, several reporters, cameramen making their way around the room taking pics and rolling video of the historical moment.

It was hot already, a little beyond my comfort zone but the anticipation of events outweighed my concern over the temperature of the room. A lady across the aisle from me was fanning with a newspaper to stay cooler and the click of the paper was becoming very familiar and a tad irritating! I regained focus and continued to observe the scurry in the room.

I sit down with my buddy Will Sturtevant in the 4th row behind the empty seats of Barrack Obama and his attorney Michael Joblonsky! A stir starts spreading around the room much like the scent from a burning incense stick ” will he show?” Will he fill the seat and bless us with his presence?

It became all too apparent that he was going to be a “no show” as time quickly passed. A few in the know began disseminating new that he was in fact a no show and the room relaxed and sighed a little.

0907, Judge Malihi calls all counsel for a side bar in his chambers! Although the content of that conversation was not revealed till later that afternoon with brunch at a Irish pub with Will and Van Irion. Van stated the judge wanted to enter into a “default judgement” which would have ended the case with a judgement against Obama and every one would have to go home even before it started. Van told me, “this is a familiar move by judges when you have the circumstances such as this, a no show!

He requests a default judgement and everyone gets to go home early, woo hoo!” Van was concerned as well as the others that not only did alot of people prepare many hours for this case but many people came from all over to see this case and they were here to see a hearing!”

He also went on to add that with all the evidence to be submitted it would be advantageous to put on record all of the evidence against Obama, to have a record of it, not merely mentioning it in a default judgement! This leads me to believe future cases can simply refer to these documents as being attached to an actual case building the case against Obama! Gentlemen, start your engines!!!

With the realization that Obama and his attorneys were not going to show up for a hearing the mood changed from “will we get to see the King squirm as hours of evidence is displayed sat to why he is not a natural citizen born in the US or perhaps an illegal immigrant with no traceable birth certificate or social security card a to “game time!”

Now that all the attempts by Obama to quash and dismiss the subpoena and hearing have failed and the fake President didn’t get his way, displaying to the courts he considers himself above the law and the Constitution the president decides to pull a “George Jones” and “no shows!”

I watched as the attorneys filed back into the room and all had agreed in the absence of the defendants they would shorten their delivery of evidence and their argument to around 30 minutes a piece! So at the 20 minutes before 10 am the hearing begins!

Van Irion takes the helm and begins his opening remarks and submission of vital pieces of evidence. As documented on the You tube video titled Obama eligibility hearing. He pulled several witnesses to the stand and questioned them with different items for submission to the courts. Fake birth certificates to Obamas own admissions in His book “Dreams of the father.

While Van was showing a short presentation with his well prepared board display on the meaning of the constitutional phrase “natural citizen” he began his closing remarks stating that he was disappointed with Mr Obama no showing and he should be held in contempt for his failure to appear, Judge Malihi abruptly told Van, interrupting his presentation, that as he was setting up his next statement to build a case against Obama for contempt the judge interjected that he was here to hear the evidence not pursue contempt charges at this time, at least that was what I took from the quick spurt of words.

In an after hearing lunch at Meehans over fish and chips van told me he was just about to to suggest that this was perhaps an impeachable offense. But we never go to that point but perhaps that will be pursued in the near future.

As the morning turned into marathon of data, the next attorney displayed his evidence and witnesses spike eloquently as the natural citizen case was building against the fake president, the Manchurian President!

As he finished with his presentation, Attorney Orly Taitz started, a tall blonde with a thick accent began her delivery with a video about Obamas signature on a school registry in Kenya where the fake president signed his name as Barry Sortero!

This was terribly interesting to me but was once again Judge Malihi told that this was irrelevant and that she make her point without the video! She turns to the crowd and starts speaking to them at which point the Judge asks her to address the court and not the crowd! She quickly realized this was going to be a case under great scrutiny as her voice began to crack with the anticipation that she was going to be held to the facts only which is what needed to be done adding only to the intensity of the moment!

As she was being reprimanded, a small group of attorneys exits out the back as the judge clamps down on the presenters of information!

There was a clear line in the room being drawn in the room that the first two cases were similar and the last speaker was more focused on the “birther issue” that has garnered much attention over the last year.

The delineating line that was established by the quick departure of the legal teams was the perception in the room by those left in attendance was the first two cases had their path and the last were reflective of another path, both very well presented but the difference apparent.

As the entourage exited the room and slowly filed down into the building corridor a few reporters along with staff of Bradley County News followed the attorneys and witnesses for a follow up question and answer session!

The tweets and Facebook messages started showing up on my phone! “Where is the Prez?” “Why didn’t he show?”

The fake president did not show and one attorney submitted the presidents itinerary for the day from the White House website and their was not a thing on it, completely empty! This led many in the courtroom the impression that Obama could have attended the hearing. It was reported the prior day that he would be in Las Vegas for the day!

The evidence is this! The president will go out of his way to make a concerted effort to go on multiple vacations with ease, play golf and basketball anywhere but when the “People of the US” call on him he no shows and is in contempt!

The fake president has spent millions of dollars to hide his records and has intentionally made it extremely difficult to gain information on who the person is that is sitting in the highest seat in the nation and arguably the Worl! Who is he? Who is this man? Where is he from? Who does he represent? Who are his parents? Why was he allowed to be certified by the RNC and the DNC? What is his purpose? Why are we allowing an undocumented person to inhabit the White House? There is a higher element at work here that even puzzles the best of them? Is this supposed to happen? Some pre-determined curse or the plan for the end to play out? Are we supposed to watch as it pans out in full view? I don’t have the answers but I can assure you it will reveal itself in the coming months and it will be ugly and sinister! I’m going with intuition and my gut here, mark my word!

Let me note that on the RNC/DNC certification it didn’t mention as it should he was constitutionally certified instead it just said certified! That was a wow moment in the courtroom.

I just witnessed history in the making? What happened today will make or break this country! We either have a constitution or not! We have a fake president that does not acknowledge the constitution or we have a constitutionally certified president! We as a civil democracy cannot have both! In a free America there is only room for us to be governed by strict adherence to the Constitution! Only when we get mixed up in the details and start destroying the foundations of our country do we see the opposite effect!

This president has made it no secret that he is not a fan of the constitution, even calling it irrelevant and outdated. We have a fake president that does not love this country and has spent many countless hours trying to destroy it!

This was never more evident than today when he flat out refused to obey the subpoena to appear and did an end around the Constitution!

There is only one president that would do what he did today and that is one that is not loyal to his country and has no allegiance or concern for its well being! He is afterall an undocumented, illegal immigrant and somehow has captured America with his spell and outmaneuvered the constitution and all it’s restraints our forefathers put in place to prevent this very action I have witnessed today!

Our forefathers, many years ago wrote the constitution to protect us from subversives such as this and put plenty of safeguards in place to prevent this hijacking of America by a subversive with many deep seated secrets that will only be revealed completely ath the “right time!” We now stand at the precipice of our collapse and are now asking the million dollar questions how and why did this happen! Our constitution was trampled upon today and it completely surprises me that we are not screaming in the streets today! Perhaps we are in the throws of Socialism or communism? Perhaps, I am enveloped and am simy not aware of it encompassing grip! Maybe the day has passed when the greatest country on Earth is no more! Have we slept one day too long!

When as a kid my grandma used to sit me on her lap and repeat to me! There does not have to be rhyme or reason or a method to the madness, just realize that it exists and confront the evil that permeates from any entity! We, child, I am afraid are seeing the collapse of our nation! A return to a Godless society pitted with the essence of evil!

The purposeful evasion of a sitting president to spend millions to hide his identity speaks volume of the sinister plan he ha for our country! Without the plan being revealed, you just know it aunt good! What is he hiding? I believe the reveal is certain in short time! This is bigger than we know! I am convinced he is in the White House for more sinister reasons than we can imagine!

So with another no show under his belt and another nose up to the American people we move forward with caution as “no show” Obama once again shows his true colors! A Marcist/Socialist with a definite plan to undermine and destroy out country! He can and will be held in contempt for his reckless activity! If we assist our elected officials with assuring them they must be also adherent to the guidelines place in that ole document and example we can set in place a standard with binds that cant be broken.

Can we put him in shackles and deport him out of the country for his contemptuous relationship with the court system? I don’t have the quick answer, but his boldness and his recent actions gives every implication to me that he believes you can’t! That people is the truest dilemma!

Put him in cuffs? Realistically, probably not! But he and anyone else that may occupy the White jouse ot an elected office must know that the possibility exists if you stomp on the constitution and no show a state court! The message must be clear, contempt and a blatant disregard for all things that are not American will not be tolerated inside this great republic! We no longer have the desire of another King George! One dictator in our American past was not tolerated by the American people.

Another arrogant, pompous and aristocratic King like personality will not be tolerated!

Obama eligibility hearing blow by blow

In Government on January 26, 2012 at 3:26 PM

This guy did a pretty good job of describing the events and he was quick too! Before I got home it was done! I’ll put my observations out once I get some sleep!

By Craig Abderson, The National Patriot:

Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.

The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.

Promptly at 9am  EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.

The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.

With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.

Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.

Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.

After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.

Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.

Game on.

5 minutes.

10 minutes.

15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.

20 minutes.

It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.

Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?

Certainly not.

Court is called to order.

(Van Irion is the first to make his argument)

Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.

Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.

Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.

Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.

June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.

Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.

It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.

The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.

Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.

Carl Swinson takes the stand.

Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.

2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.

Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.

Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.

RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.

DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.

Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.

Dreams From My Father entered.

Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.

Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.

This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.

At this point, the judge takes a recess.

The judge returns.

David Farrar takes the stand.

Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.

Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.

Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.

State Licensed PI takes the stand.

She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.

Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.

Next witness takes the stand.

This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.

Linda Jordan takes the stand.

Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.

Next witness.

Mr. Gogt.

Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.

Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.

States this is a product of layering.

Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.

Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.

Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.

Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.

Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.

Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.

Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.

Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.

Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.

Taitz takes the stand herself.

Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.

Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.

Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.

And with that, the judge closes the hearing.

What can we take away from this?

It’s interesting.

Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.

One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.

WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?

Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.

One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.

What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.

It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.

Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.

Obama vs Van Irion eligibity venue changed again

In Government on January 25, 2012 at 9:16 AM

Important Hearing Information

The court has changed the location for the hearing again. The new location is:

230 Peachtree Street N.W., Suite 850

Atlanta, Georgia  30303

If you can’t be at the hearing, watch it online.

ARTICLE II SUPER PAC WILL PROVIDE GAVEL TO GAVEL LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE FROM THE BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARING ON JANUARY 26TH

Leo Donofrio, attorney and long time researcher and defender of the Natural Born Citizen Presidential requirement, filed an Amicus Brief with the Georgia Court this week. You can read his brief on his website. The brief is very extensive. I would like to point out a couple interesting excerpts, both from page 25:

“More interesting, perhaps, is that the letter (from John Jay to George Washington) is concerned with the capacity of Commander In Chief… Considering that he called for, “a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government”, it makes sense that the natural-born citizen clause was designed to guarantee a singular allegiance to this nation. Anything less would not be a very strong check at all.”

“If the natural-born citizen clause was intended as a unification of jus soli, and jus sanguinis, we would expect to have at least one Supreme Court decision in our national judicial history, which confirms that the natural-born citizen clause does, in fact, require a unified allegiance , via birth in the country to citizen parents. Minor v. Happersett is that case.”

On Thursday I will be arguing that Minor v. Happersett requires the Georgia Secretary of State to only place names on the ballot of Presidential candidates that are born of two citizen parents. Please join me in person, by video and/or in prayer to support that our Constitution be upheld. Please also continue to encourage your friends and family to join us as Members of Liberty Legal Foundation.

In Liberty,

Co-Founder
LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION

ABC NEWS: Ga. Judge Orders President to Appear at Hearing ( to face off with Van Irion)

In Uncategorized on January 22, 2012 at 9:36 AM

Its short, sweet and simple! The article below that is! It is in typical fashion of the leftist news corps! Oh, if I must report it let’s discredit everyone around and allow the case! After all, the King must not be disturbed from his daily affairs! Oh the peasants are stirring it up again!!! Off with their heads! Tax their death and place my trash upon their graves! Please allow me to be in the presence of this ABC reporter who is so inconvenienced to tell this story! Good day!

Ga. Judge Orders President to Appear at Hearing
January 20, 2012

A judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen and can’t be president.

It’s one of many such lawsuits that have been filed across the country, so far without success. A Georgia resident made the complaint, which is intended to keep Obama’s name off the state’s ballot in the March presidential primary.

An Obama campaign aide says any attempt to involve the president personally will fail and such complaints around the country have no merit.

The hearing is set for Thursday before an administrative judge. Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi on Friday denied a motion by the president’s lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to show up.

Judge whacks Obama over eligibility: The POTUS goes down to Georgia

In Government on January 22, 2012 at 9:15 AM

Obama went down to Georgia and he was in bind and way behind looking for an election to steal! He came upon Van Irion sitting on a stump, he said boy let me tell you what! I’m the best election stealer in the world! I bet you this election box made of gold, Im the best there ever was!!! Round the mountain run boy run, devils in the white house with the election won! Your busy in the briar patch handing out dough…..I’ll bet you once you son of a buck, your butt will be in Georgia showing your true identity! Ok, that was a poor attempt at a Charlie Daniel classic! But, the POTUS OBAMA WILL BE MAKING HIS WAY TO GEORGIA THIS WEEK TO FACE OFF WITH VAN IRION! This is going to be fun!

WORLD NET DAILY REPORTS:

A Georgia judge has refused a demand from Barack Obama to quash a subpoena to appear at a series of administration hearings Jan. 26 at which residents of the state are challenging, as allowed under a state law, his name on the 2012 presidential ballot.

WND reported this week when Obama outlined a defense strategy for a number of state-level challenges to his candidacy in 2012 which argue that states have nothing to do with the eligibility of presidential candidates.

“Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates,” Obama’s lawyer argued in a motion to quash a subpoena for him to appear at the hearings in Atlanta Jan. 26.

“The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant,” the lawyer said.

Judge Michael M. Malihi, however, took a different view.

“Defendant argues that ‘if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as president of the United States’ to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend,” he wrote in his order, released today.

“Defendant’s motion suggests that no president should be compelled to attend a court hearing. This may be correct. But defendant has failed to enlighten the court with any legal authority,” the judge continued.

“Specifically, defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony … [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.’”

Hearings have been scheduled for three separate complaints raised against Obama’s candidacy. They all are raised by Georgia residents who are challenging Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot for various reasons, which they are allowed to do under state law.

It is states, usually through the office of secretary of state, that run elections, not the federal government. The national election is simply a compilation of the results of the individual elections within states.

The schedule for the hearings was set by Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings. In Georgia, a state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”

State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.

Three different plaintiffs’ groups are lined up for separate hearings, including one represented by California attorney Orly Taitz. She had the judge sign a subpoena for Obama’s testimony, and Michael Jablonski, Obama’s attorney for the cases, argued that he should be exempted.

“Make no mistake about it. This is the beginning of Watergate Two or ObamaForgeryGate. I believe this is the second time in the U.S. history a sitting president is ordered to comply with a subpoena, and produce documents, which might eventually bring criminal charges to the president and a number of high-ranking individuals,” Taitz said.

She told WND that it’s been 40 years since any court issued such a ruling concerning a president.

Separately, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona told WND he also had gotten a subpoena to be at the hearings in Georgia. He said the goal apparently is to ask him about his Cold Case Posse investigation of Obama’s eligiblity, but he said since the investigation remains open, he wouldn’t be able to say much about it.

Citizens bringing the complaints include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by Taitz; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield.

Hatfield also had filed with the court a “Notice to Produce” asking for Obama’s documents and records.

He wants one of the two original certified copies of Obama’s  long-form birth certificate.

Also, required are medical, religious administrative and other records about Obama’s birth; passports, applications and related records; college and university applications; bar association applications and materials; details on the citizenship of Obama’s father and other documents.

Taitz had filed an opposition to the motion to quash, taking Obama directly to task over what many consider an important constitutional question – the eligibility of a presidential candidate.

“It is noteworthy, that [the quash request] comes on the heels of his extended 17 day Hawaiian vacation, which cost U.S. taxpayers 4 million dollars. Mr. Obama has earned a dubious distinction as a Vacationer in Chief, Tourist in Chief, Partier in Chief and a Golfer in Chief due to his endless vacations, parties and rounds of golf. Considering … it is not too much to ask for Mr. Obama to show up once at a hearing and present his original identification records, which were not seen by anyone in the country yet,” she argued.

Obama’s attorney, Jablonski, also had argued that the state should mind its own business.

“The sovereignty of the state of Georgia does not extend beyond the limits of the State. … Since the sovereignty of the state does not extend beyond its territorial limits, an administrative subpoena has no effect,” the filing argues.

Taitz’s supporters joined a discussion on her website, where she also solicits support for the expenses of the battles she’s confronting, judging that Obama is on the defensive.

“What a joke. He claims to be too busy performing the duties of the president of the United States. How many days of vacation has he taken? How many rounds of golf? If he is too busy to provide the documents that provide the basis for meeting the requirements of the office, then perhaps he better sit out the next four years,” said one.

Wrote another, “The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant. … This is complete utter nonsense!”

In fact, a presidential elector in California brought a lawsuit challenging Obama’s eligibility at the time of the 2008 election and was told the dispute was not yet ripe because the inauguration hadn’t taken place. The courts later ruled that the elector lost his “standing” to bring the lawsuit after the inauguration.

Barack Obama
Irion said his argument is that the Founders clearly considered a “natural born citizen,” as the Constitution requires of a president and no one else, to be the offspring of two citizen parents. Since Obama himself has written in his books that his father, Barack Obama Sr. was a Kenyan, and thus subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom, Irion argues that Obama is disqualified under any circumstances based on his own testimony.

Those who argue against his birth in the United States note that numerous experts have given testimony and sworn statements that they believe Obama’s Hawaiian birth documentation to be fraudulent.

It is that concern that also has prompted Arpaio to turn over an investigation of that issue to his Cold Case Posse. Its investigative report is expected to be released in the next few weeks.

The Georgia hearing apparently will be the first time among dozens of so-far unsuccessful lawsuits brought over Obama’s eligibility issue that evidence will be heard in a court. Other cases all have been dismissed over issues such as standing, without a presentation of the evidence.

There are similar challenges to Obama’s 2012 candidacy being raised before state election or other commissions in Tennessee, Arizona, Illinois, New Hampshire and other states.

The image released by the White House in April:

Obama long-form birth certificate released April 27 by the White House
Top constitutional expert Herb Titus contends that a “natural born citizen”  is born of parents who are citizens. That argument also is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett in 1875. The case includes one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen.”

That case states:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

An extensive analysis of the issue was conducted by Titus, who has taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. He also was the founding dean of the College of Law at Regent University, a trial attorney and special assistant U.S. attorney in the Department of Justice.

“‘Natural born citizen’ in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning,” he said. “Another way of putting it; there is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations.”

If you “go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that’s precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country,” he said.

“Now what we’ve learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president.”

Van Irion stares down Obama over his eligibility next week in Georgia!

In Government on January 19, 2012 at 4:40 PM

The court date has been set! January 26th, Thursday, 9 am in Atlanta Georgia! Address below! Let the showdown begin! Join Van Irion and myself as he takes on the titans from DC and I get to witness history be made! If there is enough interest we may get together a caravan of people and send them that way to offer support! Go VAN go!!!

Donny,

In one week we will be in Georgia arguing that our Constitution be upheld, that only candidates with two U.S. citizens parents be on the ballot for President.

The hearing starts at 9am at the JUSTICE CENTER BUILDING, 160 Pryor St, Atlanta, GA – COURTROOM G40 on the ground floor.

Please be at the hearing if you are able. Also please email and let us know if you plan to be there so we have some idea of how many of our members to expect.

If you have been following the news on this issue, you may know that three different parties will be heard on the same day. Liberty Legal Foundation and our client David Welden is going first. WND ran an article today summarizing fairly well the issues and parties.

Our strategy is to keep it simple. The qualifications for President are that the candidate be:

a natural born Citizen
or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution (this no longer applies because there are no citizens that were alive at the time the Constitution was adopted),
and be the Age of thirty five Years,
and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
We concede Obama fulfills the last two qualifications. However, Obama can never fulfill the first qualification because his father was never a U.S. Citizen. Interestingly, the Senate website explaining these qualifications says,

“This… requirement raises the question of whether someone born to American parents outside of the United States would be eligible to hold the office.”

The official government website explaining the qualifications for President says that both parents must be “American”. It does not say “an American parent”. That the Congress has not pursued this issue is a travesty to our Constitution. Every member of Congress is a co-conspirator to the fraud being perpetrated on the American people.

The reason the Founders included this extra qualification for President is extremely important, today more than ever! No one can deny that the worldview and opinions of the parents greatly influence the worldview and opinions of the child. In Obama’s case, as we read in his book Dreams From My Father, this is made abundantly clear. Obama’s father held deep resentment towards the Western world, including America and transferred that outlook to his son. All of the policies of Obama that weaken America make sense through this lens. Going around the world apologizing for our country, transferring our resources overseas, pushing policies that stifle the free market and prevent job creation – these are all a direct result of Obama not being a natural born citizen. This is exactly why the Founders created the highest standard for our highest office.

Next Thursday our argument will be very simple:

Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen

The Constitution requires that both of Obama’s parents be U.S. citizens

Obama is therefore not Constitutionally qualified to run for the office of President

Accordingly, the Secretary of State of Georgia can not place Obama’s name on the ballot

Please help us be successful next Thursday. Be at the hearing to show your support. Pray for Judge Malihi and for Van as he argues the law before him. If you can’t be at the hearing, please help by spreading the word about Liberty Legal Foundation. The greater our membership, the greater our influence. Please continue to encourage your friends and family to join us.

In Liberty,

Dawn Irion

Co-Founder
LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION
 

 
Thank you to all who support Liberty Legal Foundation. Without your generous support, this work would not be possible!
Liberty Legal Foundation is an non-profit organization that relies entirely on donations to continue our fight to restore Constitutional limits on government. Please consider making a donation to help us cover our administrative and legal costs. You may make checks payable to “Liberty Legal Foundation” and mail to 9040 Executive Park Dr, Ste 200, Knoxville, TN 37923. Donations can be made online by clicking the link above.

SIDE BAR

We don’t normally send out two messages in one week. However, we have been doing a great deal of research in preparing the Obamacare Amicus Brief and would like to share some of it with you. Please look for this important message tomorrow.

 
Important Technical Note!
 
If you have never logged in to your member profile before, you will need to go through the process to reset your password. Go to http://libertylegalfoundation.org/lostpassword/ and enter the email address you used when you joined Liberty Legal Foundation. From there, carefully follow the instructions you will receive by email. You will receive one email in order to approve the password reset. You will then receive a second email with your new password. If you have any trouble please email us at help@libertylegalfoundation.org.
 
 

Help spread the word!

Check out our online stores for Liberty Legal Class Action gear.

Certification Class Action

Immigration Class Action

Obamacare Class Action

Your purchases are another way you can help support the work of Liberty Legal Foundation.

 

Share This Newsletter

or  Forward-to-a-Friend

 

 
Got a Question or Comment?
 

 

Send Van an email!

Visit us on Twitter!
Visit us on Facebook!
Contact Us:
Phone/Fax: 423-208-9953
Email: help@libertylegalfoundation.org
 

%d bloggers like this: